Any and all nontrivial systems need logging, and microservices are no exception. Messages in logs help us track running transactions and sort out any problems that may occur. The quality of the information that is stored in logs largely defines how simple or difficult it is to support a system.
The Pip.Services Toolkit contains logging components that can either output messages to the console, or hand them over to specialized services, such as ElasticSearch, AppInsights or CloudWatch.
The logger interface is defined in the Log package of the Components module. This interface contains methods that are common for most logger implementations.
The log method writes messages to the log, using the provided log level. The other methods collect messages at various logging levels and can be used in your code to add transparency.
The level property can be used to optimize code. Generating log messages can cost you resources. We can optimize the use of these resources by only generating messages for the log level that is currently set, as is shown in the example below:
One differentiating factor of the Pip.Services Toolkit is the required correlationId parameter. CorrelationId is used in all business methods and is passed in a standardized way when calling microservices. This way, the correlationId is passed along the entire chain of microservice calls, from start to finish, and is included in any and all errors and log messages. This allows us to grasp an understanding of what’s going on, in conditions where information is fragmented and collected from various sources.
To be able to generate quality logs, it’s crucial to know how the various LogLevels should be used. For some reason, most developers don’t consider this to be important, which makes it harder for users, technical support, and for developers themselves to use the system. The main purpose of LogLevel is to filter messages by their importance. When LogLevel is used incorrectly, important messages are bound to be lost, or the opposite can occur, where the output is spammed by various messages, making the search for information a real burden.
It’s also important to write messages to the log in such a way that they can be understood by people who don’t possess knowledge of the inner workings of the system.
The Pip.Services Toolkit contains a variety of logger implementations:
Loggers are usually added to microservices dynamically using a yml configuration:
config.yml
It’s not rare for multiple loggers to be used simultaneously. One logger can be used to output messages to the console, allowing developers to debug the microservice, while another logger collects messages from all running microservices in a distributed storage, allowing technical support to monitor the system.
To simplify the collection of log messages in situations when the amount of loggers and/or their configurations are bound to change, the CompositeLogger from the Components module is used. The CompositeLogger’s task is to pass along any messages it receives to all of the other loggers included in the container it’s in. Logger linking is performed in the SetReferences method (see the References Recipe).
The CompositeLogger is used in the following way:
Example output from the console logger:
The logger interface is defined in the Log package of the Components module. This interface contains methods that are common for most logger implementations.
The log method writes messages to the log, using the provided log level. The other methods collect messages at various logging levels and can be used in your code to add transparency.
The level property can be used to optimize code. Generating log messages can cost you resources. We can optimize the use of these resources by only generating messages for the log level that is currently set, as is shown in the example below:
One differentiating factor of the Pip.Services Toolkit is the required correlationId parameter. CorrelationId is used in all business methods and is passed in a standardized way when calling microservices. This way, the correlationId is passed along the entire chain of microservice calls, from start to finish, and is included in any and all errors and log messages. This allows us to grasp an understanding of what’s going on, in conditions where information is fragmented and collected from various sources.
To be able to generate quality logs, it’s crucial to know how the various LogLevels should be used. For some reason, most developers don’t consider this to be important, which makes it harder for users, technical support, and for developers themselves to use the system. The main purpose of LogLevel is to filter messages by their importance. When LogLevel is used incorrectly, important messages are bound to be lost, or the opposite can occur, where the output is spammed by various messages, making the search for information a real burden.
It’s also important to write messages to the log in such a way that they can be understood by people who don’t possess knowledge of the inner workings of the system.
The Pip.Services Toolkit contains a variety of logger implementations:
Loggers are usually added to microservices dynamically using a yml configuration:
config.yml
It’s not rare for multiple loggers to be used simultaneously. One logger can be used to output messages to the console, allowing developers to debug the microservice, while another logger collects messages from all running microservices in a distributed storage, allowing technical support to monitor the system.
To simplify the collection of log messages in situations when the amount of loggers and/or their configurations are bound to change, the CompositeLogger from the Components module is used. The CompositeLogger’s task is to pass along any messages it receives to all of the other loggers included in the container it’s in. Logger linking is performed in the SetReferences method (see the References Recipe).
The CompositeLogger is used in the following way:
Example output from the console logger:
The logger interface is defined in the Log package of the Components module. This interface contains methods that are common for most logger implementations.
The log method writes messages to the log, using the provided log level. The other methods collect messages at various logging levels and can be used in your code to add transparency.
The level property can be used to optimize code. Generating log messages can cost you resources. We can optimize the use of these resources by only generating messages for the log level that is currently set, as is shown in the example below:
One differentiating factor of the Pip.Services Toolkit is the required correlationId parameter. CorrelationId is used in all business methods and is passed in a standardized way when calling microservices. This way, the correlationId is passed along the entire chain of microservice calls, from start to finish, and is included in any and all errors and log messages. This allows us to grasp an understanding of what’s going on, in conditions where information is fragmented and collected from various sources.
To be able to generate quality logs, it’s crucial to know how the various LogLevels should be used. For some reason, most developers don’t consider this to be important, which makes it harder for users, technical support, and for developers themselves to use the system. The main purpose of LogLevel is to filter messages by their importance. When LogLevel is used incorrectly, important messages are bound to be lost, or the opposite can occur, where the output is spammed by various messages, making the search for information a real burden.
It’s also important to write messages to the log in such a way that they can be understood by people who don’t possess knowledge of the inner workings of the system.
The Pip.Services Toolkit contains a variety of logger implementations:
Loggers are usually added to microservices dynamically using a yml configuration:
config.yml
It’s not rare for multiple loggers to be used simultaneously. One logger can be used to output messages to the console, allowing developers to debug the microservice, while another logger collects messages from all running microservices in a distributed storage, allowing technical support to monitor the system.
To simplify the collection of log messages in situations when the amount of loggers and/or their configurations are bound to change, the CompositeLogger from the Components module is used. The CompositeLogger’s task is to pass along any messages it receives to all of the other loggers included in the container it’s in. Logger linking is performed in the SetReferences method (see the References Recipe).
The CompositeLogger is used in the following way:
Example output from the console logger:
The logger interface is defined in the Log package of the Components module. This interface contains methods that are common for most logger implementations.
The log method writes messages to the log, using the provided log level. The other methods collect messages at various logging levels and can be used in your code to add transparency.
The level property can be used to optimize code. Generating log messages can cost you resources. We can optimize the use of these resources by only generating messages for the log level that is currently set, as is shown in the example below:
One differentiating factor of the Pip.Services Toolkit is the required correlationId parameter. CorrelationId is used in all business methods and is passed in a standardized way when calling microservices. This way, the correlationId is passed along the entire chain of microservice calls, from start to finish, and is included in any and all errors and log messages. This allows us to grasp an understanding of what’s going on, in conditions where information is fragmented and collected from various sources.
To be able to generate quality logs, it’s crucial to know how the various LogLevels should be used. For some reason, most developers don’t consider this to be important, which makes it harder for users, technical support, and for developers themselves to use the system. The main purpose of LogLevel is to filter messages by their importance. When LogLevel is used incorrectly, important messages are bound to be lost, or the opposite can occur, where the output is spammed by various messages, making the search for information a real burden.
It’s also important to write messages to the log in such a way that they can be understood by people who don’t possess knowledge of the inner workings of the system.
The Pip.Services Toolkit contains a variety of logger implementations:
Loggers are usually added to microservices dynamically using a yml configuration:
config.yml
It’s not rare for multiple loggers to be used simultaneously. One logger can be used to output messages to the console, allowing developers to debug the microservice, while another logger collects messages from all running microservices in a distributed storage, allowing technical support to monitor the system.
To simplify the collection of log messages in situations when the amount of loggers and/or their configurations are bound to change, the CompositeLogger from the Components module is used. The CompositeLogger’s task is to pass along any messages it receives to all of the other loggers included in the container it’s in. Logger linking is performed in the SetReferences method (see the References Recipe).
The CompositeLogger is used in the following way:
Example output from the console logger:
The logger interface is defined in the Log package of the Components module. This interface contains methods that are common for most logger implementations.
The log method writes messages to the log, using the provided log level. The other methods collect messages at various logging levels and can be used in your code to add transparency.
The level property can be used to optimize code. Generating log messages can cost you resources. We can optimize the use of these resources by only generating messages for the log level that is currently set, as is shown in the example below:
One differentiating factor of the Pip.Services Toolkit is the required correlationId parameter. CorrelationId is used in all business methods and is passed in a standardized way when calling microservices. This way, the correlationId is passed along the entire chain of microservice calls, from start to finish, and is included in any and all errors and log messages. This allows us to grasp an understanding of what’s going on, in conditions where information is fragmented and collected from various sources.
To be able to generate quality logs, it’s crucial to know how the various LogLevels should be used. For some reason, most developers don’t consider this to be important, which makes it harder for users, technical support, and for developers themselves to use the system. The main purpose of LogLevel is to filter messages by their importance. When LogLevel is used incorrectly, important messages are bound to be lost, or the opposite can occur, where the output is spammed by various messages, making the search for information a real burden.
It’s also important to write messages to the log in such a way that they can be understood by people who don’t possess knowledge of the inner workings of the system.
The Pip.Services Toolkit contains a variety of logger implementations:
Loggers are usually added to microservices dynamically using a yml configuration:
config.yml
It’s not rare for multiple loggers to be used simultaneously. One logger can be used to output messages to the console, allowing developers to debug the microservice, while another logger collects messages from all running microservices in a distributed storage, allowing technical support to monitor the system.
To simplify the collection of log messages in situations when the amount of loggers and/or their configurations are bound to change, the CompositeLogger from the Components module is used. The CompositeLogger’s task is to pass along any messages it receives to all of the other loggers included in the container it’s in. Logger linking is performed in the SetReferences method (see the References Recipe).
The CompositeLogger is used in the following way:
Example output from the console logger:
The logger interface is defined in the Log package of the Components module. This interface contains methods that are common for most logger implementations.
The log method writes messages to the log, using the provided log level. The other methods collect messages at various logging levels and can be used in your code to add transparency.
The level property can be used to optimize code. Generating log messages can cost you resources. We can optimize the use of these resources by only generating messages for the log level that is currently set, as is shown in the example below:
One differentiating factor of the Pip.Services Toolkit is the required correlationId parameter. CorrelationId is used in all business methods and is passed in a standardized way when calling microservices. This way, the correlationId is passed along the entire chain of microservice calls, from start to finish, and is included in any and all errors and log messages. This allows us to grasp an understanding of what’s going on, in conditions where information is fragmented and collected from various sources.
To be able to generate quality logs, it’s crucial to know how the various LogLevels should be used. For some reason, most developers don’t consider this to be important, which makes it harder for users, technical support, and for developers themselves to use the system. The main purpose of LogLevel is to filter messages by their importance. When LogLevel is used incorrectly, important messages are bound to be lost, or the opposite can occur, where the output is spammed by various messages, making the search for information a real burden.
It’s also important to write messages to the log in such a way that they can be understood by people who don’t possess knowledge of the inner workings of the system.
The Pip.Services Toolkit contains a variety of logger implementations:
Loggers are usually added to microservices dynamically using a yml configuration:
config.yml
It’s not rare for multiple loggers to be used simultaneously. One logger can be used to output messages to the console, allowing developers to debug the microservice, while another logger collects messages from all running microservices in a distributed storage, allowing technical support to monitor the system.
To simplify the collection of log messages in situations when the amount of loggers and/or their configurations are bound to change, the CompositeLogger from the Components module is used. The CompositeLogger’s task is to pass along any messages it receives to all of the other loggers included in the container it’s in. Logger linking is performed in the SetReferences method (see the References Recipe).
The CompositeLogger is used in the following way:
Example output from the console logger: